The Hypocrisy of the Left: Brigitte Macron, Candace Owens, and the Unanswered Questions
“When I said that I would stake my entire professional career on the fact that Brigitte Macron, the current first lady of France, was born a man, there were many people of course who did not believe me because that just sounds crazy.”
The controversy surrounding Brigitte Macron's gender identity has been simmering for years, yet mainstream media and liberal commentators continue to dismiss it without addressing the core of the issue. Candace Owens, a well-known political commentator, recently reignited the discussion, shedding light on the inconsistencies and the refusal of Macron’s defenders to confront the precise claims at hand. Instead of engaging in open discourse, the response from the establishment has been to silence and discredit Owens while avoiding the fundamental question: Was Brigitte Macron born a biological female?
The Media’s Dismissal and Censorship Tactics
The article in question, like many others, follows the standard approach of left-leaning media—labeling the claims as “debunked” without presenting any concrete refutations. The repeated assertion that the allegations are "baseless" does not constitute evidence; it is simply an attempt to dissuade critical thinking. If the claims are so easily disproven, why is there a persistent refusal to provide substantive counter-evidence beyond mere denials and ad hominem attacks?
The media’s reaction is telling. The moment Candace Owens raises valid points about the secrecy and legal threats surrounding the matter, the response is to call her “far-right” and dismiss her claims outright. The strategy is clear: de-legitimize the messenger to avoid addressing the message. This tactic is not new; it has been employed repeatedly against conservative voices who dare to question the narratives pushed by liberal elites.
The Legal Threats and Macron’s Overreaction
Brigitte Macron and her allies have pursued legal action against those discussing the allegations, which is a strikingly aggressive response for something supposedly "ridiculous." If there were no merit to the claims, one would expect Macron to simply provide evidence and move on. Instead, legal action has been used as a tool of suppression, ensuring that journalists and commentators remain silent on the topic. The court’s decision to fine individuals who questioned Macron’s past only adds to the growing perception that there is something to hide. If these claims were genuinely absurd, why would they warrant such extreme legal measures?
The irony here is that the very same liberal commentators who champion free speech and criticize governments for censoring opposition voices are the ones celebrating these legal crackdowns on investigative discourse. The hypocrisy is glaring.
The Normalization of Pedophilic Rhetoric
One of the most disturbing aspects of this controversy is the continued refusal of the media to critically analyze the Macrons’ relationship in the broader context of grooming and age-inappropriate relationships. Emmanuel Macron met Brigitte when he was a minor, and she was his teacher, an undeniable case of a power imbalance and potential exploitation. Had the genders been reversed—had a male teacher formed a romantic relationship with an underage female student—the outrage from feminist and progressive groups would have been deafening. Yet, because the Macrons fit within the acceptable framework of the liberal elite, their relationship is excused, romanticized, and even celebrated.
This double standard is particularly alarming in the broader cultural context where efforts are being made to normalize relationships that should rightly be scrutinized. The same media that condemns "far-right" commentators for calling out this dynamic is actively working to shift societal norms on what is acceptable in adult-minor relationships, as seen in various leftist academic circles attempting to reframe pedophilia as a mere sexual orientation rather than a crime.
The Broader Context: Transvestigation and The Attack on Biological Reality
The Macron controversy also ties into a larger phenomenon where high-profile individuals, particularly conservative women, are accused of being transgender. However, in this case, the argument is reversed—when a credible case is made suggesting that someone may have transitioned, the very same voices that usually entertain these discussions suddenly call it a conspiracy theory. The inconsistency is undeniable.
The attempt to silence such discussions speaks to a broader agenda: the erasure of biological reality. Those questioning gender identity inconsistencies in powerful figures are immediately dismissed, yet we are simultaneously expected to accept that men can become women and vice versa in all other contexts. The selective application of these standards exposes the underlying ideological motivations at play.
Conclusion: The Real Conspiracy is the Censorship
At the heart of this issue is not whether Brigitte Macron is transgender, but rather the refusal of mainstream discourse to allow the question to be asked in the first place. If the answer were so clear-cut, why the fear? Candace Owens has raised legitimate concerns, yet instead of reasoned debate, the response has been suppression, name-calling, and legal intimidation. This is the true scandal: the deliberate attempt to stifle inquiry and enforce ideological conformity.
The people deserve transparency, and until that is provided, the persistent stonewalling will only fuel further speculation. If Brigitte Macron and her defenders want to put the rumors to rest once and for all, they must do so with clear and definitive proof—not with lawsuits and authoritarian crackdowns on speech.